Search This Blog

Thursday, 18 June 2015

ODI Cricket Is Now Too Lopsided!

Although I have enjoyed the first 4 games of the England V New Zealand ODI (50 over) tournament, it has reinforced a view I have had for some time. That is: the game has now become very lopsided and the balance of the game has swung far too far to the batsmen.
A great exponent of the 50 over game. Can he do it in tests?

Cricket always used to be a competition between bat and ball, but by-and-large in the 50 over game that has all but disappeared. I am not talking about the completely Mickey Mouse 20/20 game here. That is no more than a circus.

England chasing down a mammoth score of 349 with overs to spare is a prime example of what has gone wrong in the 50 over game. Batsmen hammering the ball to all parts of the ground whether it is a "good ball" or not. Two balls being used per innings one at either end so that the balls both retain a hardness that augers well for the batsmen. Huge, heavy bats that mean even a thick edge can fly for six and require mostly a bit of brute force by the batsman. The game has really become very lopsided with the onus on runs being scored in whatever manner they can be.
Rebalance the game. Give the bowlers more chance.

That is not what cricket should be about, it really should be about the competition between bat and ball.

So what can be done? Well boundaries could be pushed back as far as possible but that will not really cure the problems I see. The sixes being hit nowadays clear the boundary by such huge margins that there is not room in the cricket grounds for the boundaries to go back far enough. One thing that should be done is to stop using two ball per innings. Let the ball deteriorate as it always has to address the balance. The most sensible thing to do, and the one which will make the game more balanced, is to restrict the weight of the cricket bats being used. Make the batsman rely more on technique and timing rather than brute force. Reduce the distance that the ball can be hit unless it is "middled". Bring some elegance back into the game and give the bowlers a chance to use their abilities and guile and make the batsmen do the same.

Yes less runs would be scored but that would not really detract from the game.

Saturday, 13 June 2015

Gawd. It's A Saturday Again!

Saturdays in summer. What a waste of a day. Nothing to do and to make it worse it's raining cats and dogs. This should not be allowed; having Saturdays in summer. Surely they could remove Saturdays from the calendar from the middle of May until the middle of July. That way the middle of July would come round a lot quicker. Why should I wish for that to happen? Simple.

THE FOOTBALL SEASON STARTS

Yes indeedy. THE FOOTBALL SEASON. The chance to go and sit out in the cold and watch 22 men chase after a ball. The chance to go and share the tribal passions of the like-minded who, in a very considered way, support their team. Travelling hour upon hour and thousands of miles to watch 90 minutes of action. Always with the distinct possibility that they will come away disappointed because their heroes have not done the business. Picking the bones out of every kick of the ball. Identifying those heroes that have become rubbish. Bemoaning the fact that the manager has no idea what he is actually doing! Being convinced about something that they have known all their lives. Yes, the referee was rubbish! 

But oh the glory, the heart-warming feeling when their heroes persevere against all the odds and achieve that which is the sole aim. VICTORY!!!! The garnering of another precious three points in the never-ending pursuit of success. Reliving every wondrous move, every delightful pass and every thunderous 30 yard screamer that just about burst the net. Oh yes it is all worthwhile.

Meanwhile Saturdays in the summer! Oh dear. 

Tuesday, 9 June 2015

News Flash For The SNP - Scotland Is Not An Independent Country

Despite the somewhat perverse, in my view, outcome of the General Election with regard to Scotland, with the Scottish National Party hoovering up nearly all of the seats there, it needs to be remembered that Scotland is NOT an independent country. The population voted, by a fairly large majority for Scotland to stay in the United Kingdom and to be a part of the Union. The Scottish National Party failed to win that argument!

The second thing I would like the SNP to understand is that the referendum on Scottish independence only went ahead due to the fact that the Parliament in Westminster allowed it to do so.

Scotland's Parliament has powers given to it by that same Parliament in Westminster by means of devolution. Therefore those powers that it does have, have been devolved to it by the United Kingdom government. The old saying "I am the boss in my house because my wife says I can be" comes to mind.

Now I apologise if that is teaching Granny to suck eggs or whichever metaphor the reader may prefer but with the behaviour of the SNP in Westminster I think it requires stating.

Why am I waffling on about this subject? Simple. Because I cannot believe the temerity of the SNP in Westminster banging on about Scotland, in effect having its own referendum on Europe. To state that each of the countries that make up the United Kingdom has the right to veto the outcome of the European Referendum based on the individual countries votes, if the voters in that particular part of the United Kingdom are at odds with the majority is outrageous. The individual countries that make up the United Kingdom are not the members of the European Union, the United Kingdom is. The referendum will be run under the auspices of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and the result should be based on the vote throughout the United Kingdom as a whole. It is a one nation vote.

Simply put: the Scottish National Party are wrong in their demands.

Personal note: I am neither pro nor anti Europe. I have not made my mind up on the subject.






Saturday, 6 June 2015

Support The Armed Forces? - You Need To Read This. Beware: Not An Easy Read.

I have taken a copy of this from a Telegraph article from the 2nd June 2015. I hope the Telegraph will excuse me doing so. This is not an easy read which virtually moved me to tears. For those who trot out the line "All those politicians are the same" I think this puts that to bed. 
Captain Johnny Mercer now MP for Plymouth, Moor View

Johnny Mercer Conservative, Plymouth, Moor View

6:54 pm, 1st June 2015

I want to speak briefly about my two main missions in this Parliament. First, mental health provision in this country remains poor. There are some extremely dogged and determined characters who fight night and day to improve the services offered to those who struggle with mental health problems. Often, those who struggle with mental health problems cannot shout for themselves and suffer in silence because of the ridiculous stigma placed on mental health. That stigma ends in this Parliament. It is not good enough to have sympathy, empathy even, or simply to understand these issues when they affect someone close to us. It is time to get this right and I look forward to starting this crusade in Plymouth.
Secondly, the past decade and a half has defined a whole generation of us in often unseen wars against enemies of the state that only seem to grow darker. We have no complaints about the duty that we have chosen. It formed many of us; indeed, it made many of us who we are today. We were proud to defend this great nation in the same traditions of the immense sacrifices of our forefathers. However, last week my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister spoke of the gravity of the end of combat operations in Afghanistan. For many families, that marks the end of the sleepless nights by the phone and the ever-dreaded knock at the door.
I am sorry to report, however, that there remains a great stain on this nation of ours when it comes to conflict. In 2012, we reached a very unwelcome threshold when, tragically, more soldiers and veterans killed themselves than were killed on operational service in defence of the realm. It goes without saying that there are some genuine heroes in our communities and charities up and down this land who work tirelessly night and day to look after and assist those who have found returning to a peaceful life the biggest challenge of all. A great many of these veterans are not only from Afghanistan.
My key point is this: there has been a fundamental misunderstanding by Governments of all colours over the years that veterans’ care is a third sector responsibility and that the great British public, in all their wonderful generosity, support our troops well enough, and any new initiative is met with the response, “Well, there must be a charity for that.” That is fundamentally and unequivocally wrong, and I make no apologies for pointing it out to anyone of any rank or position who may be offended by my candour.
I am not a charity and neither were my men. We gave the best years of our lives in defending the privileges, traditions and freedoms that this House and all Members enjoy. It is therefore the duty of this House to look after them and, crucially, their families when they return. I would be grateful if you would grant me your patience, Mr Deputy Speaker, to bring just two of them to the attention of the House this evening.
Lance Sergeant Dan Collins of the Welsh Guards was typical of the soldiers I was privileged to command in my tours of Afghanistan. His story had a profound effect on me. I implore Members to look him up tonight before they go to bed and to read his story. He endured events that were atypical of a fighting man’s deployment in that theatre. He returned to Britain’s arms a deeply scarred man and entered a dark, dark place that too many are familiar with. Dan worked hard to try to find treatment that worked for him, but repeated changes of staff and six-hour round trips for appointments did very little indeed. He fought his demons with the same spirit and courage that he had demonstrated on a daily basis against the enemies of the state in foreign fields. When he returned home, however, unlike when he was in his battalion, we did not have his back.
Dan liked to take on his demons alone in the mountains, where perhaps the outside arena made him feel more empowered. However, in 2012, during the period of new year’s celebrations—that time of year when all the world is celebrating—Dan recorded a video message for his mum on his mobile phone. He said:
“Hey Mum. Just a video, just to say I’m sorry. Ever since I came back from Hell I’ve turned into a horrible person and I don’t like who I am anymore.”
He went on to say:
“I’ve tried everything, and there’s nothing that seems to be working. I love you, and I'll see you, okay? I love you.”
With that, our nation failed one of her bravest sons once more, as yet another victim of the Afghanistan war lost his life, not bleeding out in some dusty foreign field in the intense pressures of combat but in his homeland, which he had fought so hard to defend.
Next Monday, it will be five years to the day since I conducted a particular dawn patrol in southern Afghanistan with my troops. We were enduring one of the most contested fighting seasons of that campaign in 2010, and fear was rife. I was particularly blessed to have with me in my small team a man of colossal courage called Lance Bombardier Mark Chandler, who in our role was duty-bound to protect me in close-quarter combat while I continued in our primary trade. While most people in this country were still in a morning slumber, we closed in on an enemy position, and in an intense close-quarter gunfight Mark was shot in the face right next to me and died in my arms.
In the five years since, I have become intimately familiar with another quiet yet very stoical group of casualties of this country’s war. Mike and Ann Chandler, Mark’s parents, like parents, wives, sisters and brothers up and down this land, now endure a daily sacrifice. It is very difficult for those of us who have not experienced it to truly grasp the bottomless well of grief that comes from losing a child, husband, brother or sister in war as a result of a grave decision made in this House. Theirs is the greatest sacrifice on the altar of this nation’s continuing freedom, and it is a price that is paid daily. For many families up and down this land, it is indeed at every going down of the sun and every morning that we remember them.
I come here unapologetically to improve the plight of veterans and their families. The last Government under this Prime Minister did more than any before it in this cause, but there is still some way to go. It is a deep privilege to come to this House with the hopes of tens of thousands of Plymothians, and I do not underestimate the duty that is incumbent upon me in the years ahead. I cannot promise anything but noble endeavour, relentless positivity and an abounding sense of duty to look after those who, through no fault of their own, find themselves on the fringes of society, and who find life an interminable struggle. I look forward to the challenge.
Huge congratulations to Mr Mercer and I hope he achieves is goal. 

71 Years Ago Today - D Day

This action was perhaps the greatest military action the world has ever seen. I think that nowadays it would be incomprehensible to have to do this again. We should never forget those that took part in this endeavour nor the actions that led up to the end of the war as Europe was rolled up by the allies. Their bravery, commitment, doggedness and sheer ability gave us freedom.

OPERATION OVERLORD - LEST WE FORGET

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Tidal Power - Becoming Reality - Could It Happen Here?

I have come across a project call The Swansea Tidal Lagoon. This is a project that will provide electricity harnessing the power of the sea. It is still in the planning stage but the potential looks absolutely breath-taking. Below is a computer projection of what the lagoon would look like from above.

We are all aware of the discussions and arguments surrounding renewable energy in our area, especially the onshore wind turbines and the perceived problems they have caused. We are also well aware of the discussions regarding the offshore windfarms and their ability to blight the seascape. Whichever side of the argument you maybe on regarding these things they are intrusive and they are fairly one-dimensional in that they only provide power.

The Tidal Lagoon idea would appear to be much more acceptable. It is not as intrusive and it will provide more than just the ability to provide power, although that is it's primary role. I have put a link to a film promoting the idea in Swansea Bay below.

Why could we not have something like this in The Wash? I would have thought that the area inside The Wash would most certainly lend itself to this type of sustainable development. It would bring permanent jobs, permanent attractions and permanent income into our area.

Sometime ago, I attended a very interesting meeting in London with my good friend Cllr Craig Leyland of ELDC at which the idea of building barriers out to see to protect coastlines from flooding was discussed and received a fairly general welcome. If we then think about the problems this area has had with high tides in the recent past then this idea could also, perhaps, be seen as a way to combat some of those problems along similar lines.

Some time ago there was discussion about a Wash Barrier that would provide flood protection within The Wash area and also provide sustainable energy from the tidal action. Now I don't know a lot about that idea but I believe it was knocked back on environmental grounds to do with salt marshes and bird habitat etc. The idea being put forward for the Swansea Project would not actually have the same effect as far as I could see.

There is obviously a long way to go before the Swansea project is started let alone built but I have to say that this idea really excites me. What do you think about it? Could it be a goer? Would it be something that you would like to see?

Some links that you might like to have a look at for further information:

Swansea Tidal Lagoon Project 
http://www.tidallagoonswanseabay.com/
http://www.tidallagoonswanseabay.com/the-project/film/107/ (The film I mentioned above)

The WashTidal Barrier Project
http://www.washbarrier.org/

Monday, 1 June 2015

Why So Blooming Miserable

Getting to see a few images of the Magna Carta Barons that are going to be dotted around Lincoln as part of the celebrations. Although far from being an original idea it is a good one.

Don't know any jokes!
My only question. Why have they made them look so blooming miserable? Looks like to me they could well be saying "Come to Lincoln for the Magna Carta Celebration weekend if you must or have nowt better to do!"


Think it is going to rain!

My feet ache!

Welcome to Lincoln. No really!